Probabilistic Risk Analysis#
We established that a risk analysis answers three questions: (i) What can happen? (ii) How likely is it that that will happen, and (iii) If it does happen what are the consequences? To answer these questions typically a triplet is used \(〈s_i,p_i,x_i 〉\). Where \(s_i\) is a scenario description, \(p_i\) is the probability of the scenario and \(x_i\) is the consequence of the scenario. Risk can be defined as a set of triplets \(R={〈s_i,p_i,x_i 〉}\), \(i=1,…,N\). Because the possible scenarios in any risk analysis are infinite, and in practice the risk analyst cannot contemplate all these, an N+1 scenario that accounts for all “other” possibilities is often used.
The triplets \(〈s_i,p_i,x_i 〉\) are often presented in a tabular form as
Scenario |
Probability |
Consequence |
|---|---|---|
\(S_1\) |
\(p_1\) |
\(x_1\) |
\(S_2\) |
\(p_2\) |
\(x_2\) |
⋮ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
\(S_N\) |
\(p_N\) |
\(x_N\) |
For example, imagine that you are analyzing the risk of a bridge connecting two sides of a river. We can define five events:
Failure of the bridge due to the support beams;
Failure due to scouring around the bridge foundation;
Stop of the traffic due to a car accident;
Stop of the traffic due to damages in the pavement;
Normal operation of the bridge.
Once the scenarios are defined, we can define the triplets
Scenario |
Probability |
Consequence |
|---|---|---|
1 |
\(0.04\) |
\(2 \cdot 10^6\) |
2 |
\(0.03\) |
\(3\cdot 10^5\) |
3 |
\(0.10\) |
\(5\cdot 10^4\) |
4 |
\(0.08\) |
\(7\cdot 10^5\) |
5 |
\(1-0.04-0.03-0.10-0.08 = 0.75\) |
\(0\) |
where the consequences here are assessed in terms of economic consequences (€).
Risk Curves#
To present a visual idea of risk, we first arrange the scenarios in order of severity. That is such that \(x_1 \leq x_2 \leq x_3 \leq ⋯ \leq x_N\). By adding a column to the table above we may compute the cumulative probabilities adding from the bottom.
Scenario |
Probability |
Consequence |
Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
\(S_1\) |
\(p_1\) |
\(x_1\) |
\(P_1 = P_2+p_1\) |
\(S_2\) |
\(p_2\) |
\(x_2\) |
\(P_2 = P_3+p_2\) |
⋮ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
⋮ |
\(S_{N-1}\) |
\(p_{N-1}\) |
\(x_{N-1}\) |
\(P_{N-1} = P_N+p_{N-1}\) |
\(S_N\) |
\(p_N\) |
\(x_N\) |
\(P_N = p_N\) |
A plot of the consequences \(x_i\) against the cumulative probabilities \(P_i\) looks like shown in the Figure below.
Fig. 8.1 Example of risk curve.#
A common representation is in a log-log scale for both axis in which case the (smoothed risk) curve looks like in the Figure below.
Fig. 8.2 Example of risk curve in log-log scale.#
Going back to the previous example of the bridge, we can order the triplets in decreasing order of severity as
Scenario |
Probability |
Consequence |
Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
5 |
\(1-0.04-0.03-0.10-0.08 = 0.75\) |
\(0\) |
\(1.00\) |
3 |
\(0.10\) |
\(5\cdot 10^4\) |
\(0.25\) |
2 |
\(0.03\) |
\(3\cdot 10^5\) |
\(0.15\) |
4 |
\(0.08\) |
\(7\cdot 10^5\) |
\(0.12\) |
1 |
\(0.04\) |
\(2 \cdot 10^6\) |
\(0.04\) |
Finally, we can represent the risk curve as
Fig. 8.3 Risk curve for the bridge example.#
And in log-log scale as
Fig. 8.4 Risk curve in log-log scale for the bridge example.#
Attribution
This chapter is written by Patricia Mares Nasarre, Max Ramgraber and Oswaldo Morales Napoles. Find out more here.